“Going the Distance” with Nanette Burstein

August 11th, 2010

By Le Anne Lindsay (Tinsel & Tine)

Not only did PFS give us the opportunity to preview Drew Barrymore’s lasest comedy, Going the Distance Monday night, it included a Q&A with Director, Nanette Burstein.

This romantic comedy also feature’s Barrymore’s real life love interest Justin Long and Charlie Day (It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia) for added comic relief. The movie deals with the pitfalls of long distance relationships. Garrett (Long) meets Erin (Barrymore) when he blocks the screen of her old school centipede arcade game – “Who does that?” What starts out as a casual hook up, turns into the real thing.  Problem, Erin is in NY for a summer internship at the Sentinel Newspaper and plans to go back to San Francisco to finish her degree. Garrett is just establishing himself as an A&R rep at a small record label.

Personally, I’ve never been in a truly long distance relationship, but I once dated a guy that lived in Delaware (less than 2hrs away) and he broke up with me citing -logistics. Dated another guy in Allentown, (again, less than 2 hrs away in the other direction) sent him a text once with a very steamy promise if he agreed to drive to me after work. His reply, “Not during the week, cause I’d  have to leave your place super early in the morning to get to work on time”.

So the movie’s theme is very real and relate-able. The chemistry between the two is good. Their initial “sleep over” involving Top Gun soundtrack is laugh out loud funny. The standard falling in love montage works. Things like trust issues, phone sex, and surprise visits are all covered with good humor and realism. Side issues like both characters working in industries that are in states of major change and severe cutbacks add to the dilemma. Christina Applegate and my personal favorite comedian, Jim Gaffigan are fun as Erin’s dry humping sister and brother-in-law. And Garrett’s two side kicks, mustachioed, Box (Jason Sudeikis) and bathroom open door policy Dan (Day) keep him busy during Erin’s absence.  Still, somehow, I feel the movie is a little flat.

As always, feedback is welcome.  If you attended the preview screening and disagree or agree, write a comment.

Nanette Burstein Q & A excerpts:

Q: What attracted you to the film?

NB: The story was such an honest premise and I’d been in a long distance relationship before, so I really related to the subject matter. And it was very funny.

Q: The dialogue seems really realistic, was there a lot of improv involved?

NB: Yes, we would shoot the script, but then we would improvise all the scenes as well, so we had both options in the edit room. Everyone brought their improv chops to the set, so we got some really funny moments.

Q: Your real life long distance relationship was how far?

NB: LA  – NY.  In fact, he was in the music industry. Bi-Coastal’s tough.

Q: How did you get the supporting cast, do you know them?

NB: No. We just asked them to do it. Jason actually auditioned. Although I already knew I wanted to cast him. This was Charlie’s first movie, so he was excited. I got all my first choices, I was really lucky.

Q: How about the leads?

NB: In the very first draft of the script the characters were younger, they were in their mid twenties, so I was thinking of different leads at the time given their age, then we decided to make them older. 1) because it made the stakes feel higher. As you get older, issues of love and career seem to grow in intensity and 2) Drew expressed interest in the script and I was excited about that. I had met her in person – you’re so used to her playing America’s sweetheart, but in real life she has a different personality. She has that same charm you always see on screen, but she’s also tough and vulnerable and speaks her mind and is quite funny, so I thought she’d be perfect to play the role. So that’s how it happened.

Q: The very first scene in the bar tells you this is not your usual romantic comedy.

NB: Yeah. I think the model, at least tone wise for me, was the movie Knocked Up. Realistic premise had a lot of humor, was raunchy but never inappropriately so, and it was really equal between the man and woman’s point of view, which we tried to do in this movie too.

Q: Do you feel Drew and Justin’s off-screen relationship added to the chemistry?

NB: I would say so. Not only chemistry, but intimacy, some of the more comedic love scenes like the phone sex or having sex on the dining room table, can be awkward with actors that don’t know each other; but because Drew & Justin know each other so well and are so comfortable with each other, it made those scenes easy.

Q: Since this was your first feature length movie, while you were preparing, what made you most nervous?

NB: Everything! Across the board! It was like, “what have I got myself into?” You have to seem incredibly confident eventhough you’re figuring it out as you go. I didn’t even know what most to be nervous about until I got in the situation and then I quickly figured it out. I guess the biggest challenge was with shooting the script and shooting the improv and trying to make it look good as well; you only have so much time in the day and we were not exactly scheduled properly given all I wanted to do, so you’re always under the gun time wise and that’s always a little stressful.

Q: How did you get involved with the script?

NB: I had made documentaries (American Teen 2008 , The Kid Stays in the Picture 2002 “Say It Loud: A Celebration of Black Music in America” 2001)
so I was being sent scripts from Hollywood to be considered as a feature length director. I really responded to this script and met with the producers; I don’t know what I said, but they decided to hire me. I then brought in new writers that are not credited because of WGA rules, but we rewrote the script quite a bit. It’s hard to say what someone else would have done; I just tried to take a very realistic approach to it and also find very talented funny, actors so we could do a lot of improv. It was important to make the sets feel honest. Most movies for example, people live in these fabulous apartments in New York and it’s totally unrealistic, that’s a pet peeve of mine.  I just tried to make it feel really honest and have a lot of heart and humor.

To listen to the complete Q&A click HERE.  The commentator is a host from co-sponsors Wired 96.5.

Maybe your script could be the next one that Nanette Burstein responds to – PFS is offering a screenwriting course with Marc Lapadula, professor of screenwriting at Yale University and former SW professor at University of Pennsylvania. He will lead a 3-week seminar in the craft of screenwriting at Philadelphia Soundstages. Click HERE for details.

What’s happening on Tinsel & Tine?  Our dining experience at Buddakan.

Commentary – Countdown to Zero

July 30th, 2010

By Le Anne Lindsay (Tinsel & Tine)

Talk about a horror film! Not in tone, writer/director Lucy Walker (Devil’s Playground and Blindsight) handles the subject of nuclear proliferation with incredible depth and journalistic integrity. But I believe most would agree, re-examining our thoughts on the mass destruction possible through nuclear war, evokes an overall reaction of horror.

On the other hand, according to the film, most of the general population around the world is not examining it too closely. The film interviews people on the street, asking questions like how many countries have nuclear weapons? Of those countries, how many nuclear bombs would that be? How often do you think about nuclear attack? The interviews revealed most people are clueless and don’t really think about it very often at all. Had I been polled, I would have been among this majority. I’ve seen Iranian Leader, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on the news. He definitely gives you a maniacal, world domination, sci-fi villain vibe; yet all the talk of Iran having nuclear capability pretty much goes in one of my ears and out the other.

The extraordinary thing this film reveals is the fact that terrorist threat or unstable dictators may be a secondary danger when it comes to nuclear destruction. The real threat is an oops!

In the last 20 years “the button” was almost pushed because of careless message taking; the US informed Russia we’d be sending up a missile that had to do with studying something about the atmosphere or some such innocuous matter and the message never got through to Boris Yeltsin, who was advised that Russia was under nuclear attack from the US and an immediate response in kind must be activated. Yeltsin, fortunately, decided not to act too quickly.

The next close call came because of a defective computer chip; the malfunction of the chip sent a signal for launch ready alert. Codes were entered, keys inserted, before finding out it was all a false alarm.

The one that is really laughable, were it not such a serious subject, is when a training tape was unknowingly inserted and everyone thought it was the real thing being seen on their monitors- creating a The War of the Worlds scenario.

Of course Countdown to Zero is being compared to An Inconvenient Truth, rightly so as the films share the same producer, Laurence Bender. Once again there is no shortage of interviews with credible experts, scientists and world leaders.

I was moved by a clip of the father of the atomic bomb, Robert Oppenheimer, having become Zen after witnessing Hiroshima, tearfully quoting the Bhagavad Gita. The film also covers how easy it is to get the highly enriched uranium or plutonium needed to make a nuclear bomb, the process of enrichment, the easy access black market for “yellow cake”… A lot is covered in 90min!

For details on Lucy Walker’s challenging journey to create this documentary, read her interview with Damon Smith of Filmmaker Magazine .

In the end my re-examination of nuclear destruction was less horrific than previously thought. It turns out to be very simple. Not that I’m one who looks for adversity or challenge. I don’t think anyone loves creature comforts more than I do. But you have to admit, throughout the history of time, we as human-beings are at our best in times of shared crisis and tragedy.  Amazing feats defying nature can come from a need for survival. Beyond that, personally, I don’t believe God will allow human folly, greed, or ego to destroy the earth. But if I’m wrong, two good things will come from it; 1) my soul travels on its journey with the Source to a different plane. 2) my student loans and credit card debt will be wiped clean.

On a different note entirely, as they say on “The Today Show”, PFS had its first outdoor screening at the Clay Studio in Olde City, Thursday night. Young Frankenstein. A stack of pizza boxes accompanied a group of 18-20 demographic at the screening, always desirable (when tame). The rest of the crowd was a good mix of  about 30 or so attendees, pretty good for a first time event.

The film was preceded by 3 shorts by The Clay Studio’s Resident Artist, Ryan Wilson Kelly.  The skits consisted of humorous play acting using props of clay and paper mache made from clay casts.

Next Clay Studio screening will be on Aug 26th – WALLACE & GROMIT: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit.

Also visit Tinsel & Tine for my commentary on Inception.

Commentary – The Kids Are Alright

July 22nd, 2010

By Le Anne Lindsay (Tinsel & Tine)

Director Level PFS members were invited to a screening of The Kids Are Alright, at the Main Street 6 theater in Manayunk, which meant no parking garage fees or kiosk hassles for me for a change – yay!

To recap the plot of the film, Jules (Julianne Moore) and Nic (Annette Bening) are a lesbian couple who each had a child by the same sperm donor, Paul (Mark Ruffalo). The kids, Laser (Josh Hutcherson) and Joni (Mia Wasikowska, Alice from Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland) are now at an age where they’ve decided they want to find their donor father.

Co-writer and Director Lisa Cholodenko, decided to make it a lighthearted look into the non-traditional family. There’s a social commentary being made; however, entertainment value was obviously the director’s main objective.  Which I don’t have a problem with at all; but those looking for a more creative, Indie feel, may feel it’s too studio. Those looking for a Gay film may feel it’s not issue driven. And on the other hand, those looking for a mainstream comedy with two hot (well, formerly hot) stars having sex scenes, may be disappointed.  It straddles all three genres, I would say with good balance, but I’m certain many will disagree with me.

After the screening I got to chat with four intelligent movie-goers who also happened to be lesbians. Two were a couple together 14 years, the other two, just friends.  One of the friends thought the film was very enjoyable and agreed with most aspects of the plot and the relationship between Jules and Nic.  She’s a proponent of adding a mainstream element to some gay films in order to get them made and out to the public.  The other friend felt there was way too much heterosexual sex taking place, and she didn’t like or identify with any of the characters.  The couple, felt the characters were unlikable by design, to create a certain stereotype, not just the lesbians, but Ruffalo’s character as well.

Jules character is that of an eat organic, create a compost, can’t commit to a career choice.

Nic is the matriarch of the family, a doctor with strict rules on etiquette and discipline.  She disapproves of  one of her son’s friends and describes him as being “untended”.

Paul is a motorcycle riding, free spirit type, who is just now starting to put down roots with a new restaurant and home.

Joni is a smart, good-girl, now ready to fight for some independence from “Mom’s”.

Laser is on the cusp of  being either a decent kid with some abilities as a jock, or being a smart mouthed, screw up.

Tanya (Yaya Dacosta) is Paul’s hostess and “f” buddy, before he meets his kids, which has nothing to do with the plot, but I like this model turned actress and just wanted to give her a shout out.

I didn’t find the characters to be unlikable, neither by impression or design. I thought Moore and Bening were convincing as a couple and both pulled off a slight masculinity that made them credible as lesbians.

Another point brought up in our after film discussion was about the dialogue interjecting too much “Oprah Speak”,  they felt although lesbians do have a tendency to process everything to death, this film went a little overboard to illustrate the point.

My main problem with the film was that Paul was made to be the villain, yet he was no more guilty of tearing the family apart than Jules.  Although perhaps I’m biased, after all, Mark Ruffalo is my second favorite Hollywood Crush after Robert Downey, Jr., so I can totally see why even a lesbian would have trouble staying out of his bed.

Reminder, deadline is drawing near for the 19th Philadelphia Film Festival (Oct 14-24) create a trailer competition.  Click HERE for details.  I think it’s great they’ve opened it up to the public this year. Normally, the festivals work with a team of students at one of the Philadelphia Universities. If chosen it really is great exposure for an up and coming filmmaker!

Cheap Trick at the Piazza

July 16th, 2010

by Le Anne Lindsay (Tinsel & Tine)

PFS and 102.9 WMGK continued their Rockin’ Reels at the Piazza series last night with Live at Budokan. For anyone unfamiliar, the band Cheap Trick recorded this footage at their 1978 concert in Japan; the release of which really put the band on the map. The Live at Budokan album is number 430 on the Rolling Stone magazine’s list of the “500 Greatest Albums of All Time”.

Because Cheap Trick is currently on tour to promote their newest release “The Latest” – available on CD, vinyl and 8-track, WMGK was able to get Rick Nielsen & Tom Petersson to come for a signing. Thus the reason PFS changed the scheduled screening of Shine a Light to Live at Budokan.

As I’ve stated before, I’m careful making commentary on screenings that require a background or knowledge of a subject to which I’m unfamliar. Although “I Want You To Want Me” is one of my favorite party songs, I didn’t know until last night who sang it (shameful, I know) but not a problem, it gave me the opportunity to chat up the attendees!

This couple turned out to be with other sponsors Mitsubishi Philadelphia,  they were actually getting albums signed for others back at the office. The dog is named Loki and yes, she really is pink, poor thing has mange. She had just rescued it from the shelter and is hoping to find her a good home.  I think that’s sweet and commendable, but as a germophobe, I didn’t care for the fact that Loki kept trying to stick her mangy head under my skirt!

This adorable father/daughter share musical tastes, he took her to a Cheap Trick concert last summer and she got hooked! She’s also big into Def Leppard and Poison.

Then I came upon this Cheap Trick enthusiast who had the following to say about the Live at Budokan concert and Cheap Trick in general:

“I Want You To Want Me” sounds completely different on the studio version, almost has a country sound. The energy of the fans is a big part of this live performance at Budokan; the release of the live album really put everything into a whole different dimension for the group. There are so many bands that idolize Cheap Trick, but they’ve always been an underrated band. They are really a band’s band and Rick Neilson is a musician’s musician, he played with John Lennon and so many others over the years, but again, this Live at Budokan recording really transformed them into a fun band- Devon Mercer.

And later during the film I sat in front of these two gentlemen, from their comments I could tell they were really familiar with the music.  On the right is Robert, he has a masters in music composition. On the left  is Derrick, he’s a musician that still plays quite a bit.   And here’s their take on Cheap Trick:

The band is one of the greatest power pop bands of all time, power pop is a genre that sort of the psychic continuation of the Beatles if you will, with heavier guitars, into the 70’s and 80’s. In fact, we were in a power pop band called Wunderband in NYC in the late 80’s & 90’s and were very often compared to Cheap Trick. Subconsciously we must have digested some of their sound, but we weren’t deliberately trying to sound like them. But they are idols of many bands, they don’t get nearly enough credit for what they’ve done. It’s an outrage that they haven’t been inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame. By now they should have been recognized for their longevity and influence on so many other musicians; they gig over 200 days a year and they were the first to do a double live album. When you hear hipster bands say “We’re big in Japan”, it’s a reference to these guys. They made recording at Budokan significant. In fact, their hit “Surrender” was first recorded and released as a studio album, but it shot through the roof, once they released the Live at Budokan version. They are a real rock and roll band that puts on a great show! Hey, you should call this piece  – “The Last String Bender” – Robert Fanelli and Derrick  Ayers.

Summer outdoor movie fun is not over yet; PFS has even added a new screening venue and new partners -The Clay Studio and Elfreth’s AlleyIn the Mind of the Artist. All films will be projected at dusk onto the side of  The Clay Studio from Flagpole Park (on the south side of the gallery).  First screening is July 29th Mel Brooks’ comedy classic, The Young Frankenstein, which I’ve never seen.

I have been looking forward to seeing The Kids Are Alright, with Annette Bening, Julianne Moore and Mark Ruffalo. Bening and Moore are a lesbian couple who each had a child by the same sperm donor (Ruffalo) and the kids decide they want to find this anonymous father.  PFS members (Director Level and above) and me as blogger! Get to see a sneak preview of this film next Tuesday (7/20).

The DVD Swap at Triumph Brewery has been postponed. New date to be announced soon.

One last thing, I just got back from Vegas, baby!  If you’d like to read my post on Tinsel & Tine  click HERE.

Blogging Catch Up & Despicable Me

July 1st, 2010

By Le Anne Lindsay (Tinsel & Tine)

I fell down on my PFS blogging duties, as I wasn’t able to attend last Thursday’s screening of Almost Famous, as part of the Rockin’ Reels at the Piazza summer series, in collaboration with 102.9 WMGK.

I also missed last Saturday’s screening of  Wings (1927), the first film to win the Academy Award for Best Picture (the only silent film to ever do so),  screened at Macy’s (Old John Wanamaker Building) with live organ accompaniment.

And although I’ve yet to catch the wave of dedication and passion for the Twilight saga ; it would have been fun to witness the pandemonium of screaming fans who showed up to the Free screening of Twilight: New Moon, introduced by second tier stars Jackson Rathbone and Bronson Pelletier which also took place on Saturday.  Click HERE to see Rathbone and Pelletier Q&A footage, filmed by PFS Managing Director before the screening.

If any readers were at any of the above events, we’d LOVE to hear your comments and feedback!

Tinsel & Tine LogoMy reason’s for not being able to attend some PFS happenings, had to do with blogging conflicts with my own site, Tinsel & Tine – check out my posts from the movie premiere event  The Evils and coverage of the NYC FoodFilm Festival.

Last night PFS offered a limited number of tickets for the preview screening of Despicable Me (Directors Pierre Coffin, Chris Renaud). The latest in what seems to be a slew of Computer-animated 3D films.  Steve Carell gives voice to the super-villain, despicable Gru, who’s in the midst of hatching a plan to steal the moon, assisted by his near senile, evil scientist, Dr. Nefario (Russell Brand) and his brood of commercially viable minions (pictured).  The plan goes awry when he decides to involve three orphaned girls, Margo, Edith & Agnes (Miranda Cosgrove, Dana Gaier, Elsie Fisher) and gets further complicated by the young, super-nerd villain, Vector (Jason Segel).

The film’s humor and writing is not as spot on ridiculously funny as the Shrek movies or as clever as the Toy Story movies, but it is delightful!  Its silly humor often caught me off guard, creating sudden bursts of laughter.  And I am a sap; there’s a Grinch’s heart growing out of the frame element to the movie that will melt the hearts of children and adults alike.

Next up: Shine a Light (7/15 7pm Piazza at Schmidts) A career-spanning documentary on the Rolling Stones, directed by Martin Scorsese.

DVD Swap (7/21 6:30-8pm Triumph Brewery) One man’s trash is another man’s treasure – plus for singles it could be a really cute meet! I might pretend I wanted Beowulf, if the guy holding the DVD was hot enough. $10 admission benefits the upcoming Philadelphia Film Festival (Oct. 14-24)

Commentary – Jonah Hex

June 18th, 2010

Jonah Hex poster

Le Anne Lindsay (Tinsel & Tine)

Whenever a film is based on a comic book character, I always feel intimated about making commentary. Sure there have been constant DC (and other) Comics made into flesh and blood movies; some like Batman & Superman done 2 & 3x over. Comic book aficionados seem to be accepting of the fact that deviations and poetic licenses are made for the big screen versions of their favorite graphic novels.

But when it comes to critiquing these films, I feel a background in knowing the character from its original source is needed to do a proper assessment. My knowledge is strictly based on a childhood of Saturday morning cartoons, of which Jonah Hex was not apart.

I went in search of an official Jonah Hex (the graphic noJonah Hex Graphic Novel Imagevel) blogger and found one – Matching Dragoons.  This site contains interviews with the actors, Jonah Hex tidbits, explanations of character plot points by volume etc… But the one thing it didn’t contain was a review of the film. Unlike me, who through PFS, got to see a preview screening on Wednesday night; this Jonah Hex junkie has to wait until the official film opening tonight.

So my idea of giving this guy the floor and re-blogging his review and user comments were not to be.

So here’s my take – First off, it is blissfully short – running time 85 minutes.  Probably a good thing for Josh Brolin, who as the lead character, has to chew off words out of a crooked slant. The prosthetic is awesome, but really looks uncomfortable.  Now in the movie, this deformity comes from being branded with a QT by his nemesis Quentin Turnbull (John Malkovich).  Hex later takes a fiery axe and brands his own face to at least obliterate the initials.

According to Wikipedia, the story of his deformed face is quite different. Hex was more or less raised by Indians. Similar to Jake in Avatar, who had to fight an un-accepting rival after being adopted by the Na’vi tribe.   In Jonah Hex – “He was soon betrayed by the envious son of the chief while on a raid. He returned years later to challenge him in a sacred tomahawk battle, but the chief’s son sabotaged Jonah’s tomahawk. Jonah used his knife in self-defense when the tomahawk broke. The tribe saw this as breaking the rules of the sacred battle and sentenced Jonah to wear the mark of the demon by pressing a searing hot tomahawk to his face.”

In this film, Hex is married with a son to a Native American and is later nursed back to health by her tribe; we are not privy as to how his original association with the tribe came about.  Although it is a set up to Hex’s supernatural powers, that of being able to talk to the dead.  This is my favorite part of the film.

Here’s a list of my favorite communicators with the dead in order:

Hurly (Jorge Garcia) Lost, Allison Dubois (Patricia Aquette) The Medium,  Cosmos Topper (Roland YoungTopper,  Oda Mae Brown  (Whoopi Goldberg ) Ghost, Lucy Muir (Gene Tierney) The Ghost and Mr. Muir,  Melinda Gordon (Jennifer Love HewittThe Ghost Whisperer.

You’ll find, one of  my major things when making commentary – I always look for romantic chemistry, even when there’s only a hint of a love story. I’m also not ashamed to admit, as a straight woman, I like looking at female eye candy, and I find Megan Fox to be extraordinarily beautiful!  However, this film would have been better off without a femme fatale at all. Fox’s character, with a pencil thin corseted waist, is such a waste. No chemistry between she and Brolin and Fox’s acting is as thin as her waist.

Because I don’t have a big screen TV or Blue Ray, I normally pay full price for action films in the theater; not wanting to miss out  in terms of CGI and action sequences. This one I could have seen on my cheap DVD player and antiquated picture tube set and been just fine.

Next upAlmost Famous at Piazza at Schmidts (A favorite flick of PFS Managing Director) Thursday, June 24th 7pm sponsored by WMGK.  Great way to spend a summer evening!

Commentary – Cyrus and John C. Reilly Q&A

June 11th, 2010

By Le Anne Lindsay (Tinsel & Tine)

Cyrus Movie

How great was it that PFS got John C. Reilly to come to the preview screening of his film Cyrus? – Really great!  The screening was packed with PFS members who are fans of Reilly’s work and Reilly was laid back with good quips for the audience at the Q & A following the film. (read Q&A highlights below)

I had seen a trailer for Cyrus, but hadn’t read any reviews from Sundance.  The trailer led me to believe it was a total comedy, maybe not as broad as Step Brothers, but close.  If you’re looking for that type of movie, then you’ll be disappointed in Cyrus, but if you are looking for something much more real and relatable, then you’ll feel like me, pleasantly surprised.

John C. Reilly plays John, a guy in his 40’s who is just mediocre; he even describes himself as Shrek, which is so on target.  And as Shrek found his Fiona, John finds Molly (Marisa Tomei) and although Molly stays a sexy, adorable “princess”, not an “ogre” underneath, there’s still wonderful chemistry between them. Really, even to the point where you could actually picture John C. Reilly and Marisa Tomei being together in real life.  But come to think of it, she also had good chemistry with Mickey Rourke in The Wrestler, so I suppose one day she’ll be honored for her body of work, and they’ll say, she showed an amazing talent for portraying women turned on by cartoon-faced men.

Anyway, their romance has only one hitch, a big fat hitch named Cyrus (Jonah Hill), Molly’s 21 year old son that makes Oedipus look like a mere Mama’s boy.  He acts like he’s cool with his mother’s new relationship to her face, but despises John when Molly’s not around.

I make light in my description of the plot, but in actuality it’s a thoughtful movie, a snap shot of life.  After all, there are a lot of single women out there that are in their early 40’s, still really hot and vital and ready to get back to dating; after giving all their attention to a child or children for basically the last 20 years of their life. And how does that child or children react to the change?

The only semi-contrived aspect of the film, is Catherine Keener’s role as John’s ex-wife and best friend, Keener played this same type character in The Soloist with Robert Downey, Jr. and I think the toss away aspect of these roles do her a disservice.

But otherwise, I felt the character’s conversations were so natural; which we later found out during the Q&A, the Duplass Brothers, (director/writers) wrote a lose script and instructed the actors to improvise most of the dialogue. By the way, these are the same filmmakers of Baghead, a unique film to rent if you haven’t yet seen it.

Q&A with John C. Reilly

Q: Was Marisa Tomei really that hot in real life? (asked by a woman)

Reilly: Yeees,  She’s really hot, I saw her naked body and she saw mine unfortunately, and she’s still recovering.

Q: How long did the little Niagara scene take to film in The River Wild?

Reilly: Wow, your getting very specific, that movie was… I don’t remember how long that scene in particular took, but it was ridiculous how long we spent on the water, they had to helicopter everything in cause the gag of the movie was the canyon would not let us out… but who cares about River Wild, bless your heart, but let’s talk about Cyrus.

Q: How does your taste as an actor differ from your taste as an audience member? And do you prefer scripted to improvised?

Reilly: My tastes tend towards salty. (laugh) I like a lot of documentaries that’s where I feel you learn about the human condition. (some favorites: Food Inc, Grizzly Man, The White Diamond, Stevie) In terms of whether I prefer improvisational or not, depends on how well the script is written. If it’s a great script then you don’t need to improvise.  This one was crazy, it’s almost all improvised. The script was written, and it was a really great script; the Duplass Brothers worked really hard on it. Then we got to the set and they said, we don’t want to rehearse and we would really like to use the first take of everything you do and we want you to forget the script and not use the dialogue that we’ve written.  So we used the script as a kinda blueprint and we kinda just felt our way through the scenes as we got to know the characters and each other better. And so yeah, 90% of what you see is the first take and improvised.

Q: Did that require a lot of conversations between you guys before you got in front of the camera?

Reilly: No. They were very adverse to that. At times, I’d be like, what do you want exactly? And they’d say – just go with your instincts.  And I’d feel like, my instinct is to go with what you want. But umm it was a challenge, and at times very uncomfortable, but I’m really glad they insisted working that way, because that’s how they made The Puffy Chair and Baghead.

Q: How  was working with Jonah and Marisa?

Reilly: It was really fun, I know Jonah, he had a small part in Walk Hard.(loud clapping from audience)  Apparently a lot of people really love Cox. For those of  you who didn’t see the movie, I’m not being dirty, that’s the character’s name.

Marisa and I, we only met one time, and we shot this movie in order, so as you see me getting to know Marisa in the movie, that was really me getting to know Marisa. So I felt really lucky to have that organic process, what you see is what you get.

Q: Can I offer you a Smirnoff Ice?

Reilly: Yeah sure, does it have like jungle juice in it or something? Is this a promotion? Did Smirnoff pay you to come up here?

(Audience boos)

Q: No. It’s a huge thing going across the country in colleges.

Reilly: Sounds like a promotion, but thanks, I’ll drink it later, it’s a little warm.

Q: Who wrote the music that the character Cyrus was supposed to have written in the film?

Reilly: Mike Andrews. He’s a brilliant musician and song writer who wrote music for Donnie Darko and all the music for Walk Hard.

Q: I really related to Cyrus, this is my life, this is the story of my life.

Reilly: I came from a family of 6 kids, so I ran screaming and running out of the house by the time I turned 18, so it’s tough for me to relate to Cyrus’ experience.  But the movie has appeal for a lot of different people.  Older people do relate to bringing a sexual partner into the house with children at home. (audience silence) it got real quiet (laughter). And younger people, well, I asked this guy who was driving us around at Sundance what he thought of the movie and this guy said:  “There were many times when I came home from college and my Mom would be dating some dude and it was really awkward. First I wanted to pretend it wasn’t happening cause you don’t want to imagine your mom having sex with anyone, and secondly, I didn’t know if the relationship was going to last, so should I be nice to the guy?”  So anyway, it struck a chord with him and I’m glad it struck a chord with you.

Q: Have you heard Paul F. Tompkin’s impression of you?

Reilly: I’m friends with or thought I was friends with Paul Tompkins and I have not heard this alleged impression. But very few people do an accurate impression of me, Leo DiCaprio is the only one I’ve ever heard really nail me, and he did it when he was 17 years old!  (pretend outrage) I was like, How dare you, rats!  I’ll hear Paul’s impression of me when he has the guts to do it to my face.

Q: How do you choose a script?

Reilly: Do you have a script that you’d like me to read?  Is that where this is going?  Are you about to ice me bro? (laughter)

I usually look for something I haven’t done before, I try to surprise people, try to do something different than the last thing I did and try to work with people that seem really inspired and enthusiastic about what they want to do, cause then your in good hands.

Commentary – Solitary Man

June 4th, 2010

By Le Anne Lindsay (Tinsel & Tine)

When I mentioned to a couple people I was going to a preview screening of Michael Douglas’ new film Solitary Man,  (Directors, Brian Koppelman & David Levien) their first response was “I like Michael Douglas”.  That does seem to be the general consensus, and I’m onboard. I first fell in love with him back in the 80’s as Jack T. Colton, Kathleen Turner’s romance book hero come to life in Romancing the Stone.  However, not even Michael Douglas’ likability will have you rooting for him in Solitary Man.  Ben Kalmen is an immature, self-destructive, lech. He’s supposed to be lovably irrepressible and sagaciously fighting back from professional disgrace. But mostly, you just feel like tuning out and leaving him to his own devices.

Of course,  you wouldn’t want Kalmen to have it all together, what good would that be in a character study type film.  I feel the problem comes, in the execution of revealing who this character was, in relation to who he’s become.  We don’t get that until the very last scene and that’s just too late. The other difficulty – it’s too dialogue heavy, not in a clever, fast paced Nancy Meyer’s film way,  this is more expositional, soliloquy.

I love Danny DeVito, but he and Douglas’s chemistry could have been used to better results.  I love Susan Sarandon, she’s aging so beautifully and she’s still so sexy; she plays Kalmen’s ex-wife, but her character seems too sympathetic to her ex-husband and although a few years have passed since their divorce, we aren’t privy as to why she’s so good with everything.

Imogen Poots is a most horrid name, but the actress with this unfortunate moniker was excellent in the film; she plays one of the young women Douglas seduces, who gets far more than what she gives.

Asian Bistro_spicysalmonAfter the film, I went to Olde City Asian Bistro. As mentioned in my previous posts,  PFS is recommending film-goers patronize this restaurant before and/or after a preview screening.  It’s a Japanese restaurant with upscale decor, as most establishments on Market Street in Olde City. The service  last night wasAsian Bistro_seaweedsalad warm,  inviting and at the same time professional.  I believe sitting at a Sushi Bar can be conducive to conversation with strangers; and if you knew the stranger to the left and/or right of you had also just screened the same film you just saw, that could create a sort of Cheers atmosphere for PFS film Asian Bistro_sushiattendees!

This did not happen last night, but I benefited all the same – since I was the only patron from PFS, my entire meal was comped!  And I received two fabulous complimentary dishes, I didn’t even order!  A combo seaweed and shrimp mango salad.  And a spicy tuna round, not a roll, topped with a flame charred mango chutney – both simply wonderful and summery!

Hope to see you there next time.

Hello PFS Members and Movie-goers

June 3rd, 2010

My name is Le Anne Lindsay and I’m so excited about being a contributor to the Philadelphia Film Society Blog!

For the last two years I’ve enjoyed writing a blog called Tinsel & Tine.  It’s film-centric, however, it also contains posts on dining out  -  So it’s Film/Hollywood [Tinsel] and Food/Dining  [Tine] (fork tine).  When I’m able to write a post tying film and food together, then it’s even more fun!

Such as the post I wrote last week, regarding Philadelphia Film Societies new membership benefit: 10% discount at Old City Asian Bistro (located at 2nd and Market) starting tonight for the preview screening of Solitary Man Click HERE to read the post on Tinsel & Tine.

Because the PFS website was undergoing changes, my first few posts for them have been on Tinsel & Tine.  But my next post (Commentary on Solitary Man) will be written on the PFS blog – so stay tuned!

In the meantime check out previous posts:

The Last Waltz – Outdoor Screening at Piazza at Schmidts

Winter’s Bone – with Director, Debra Granik Q&A

Alien – Sci-Fi discussion following the screening

Some older posts:

PFS Spring Preview Day 1

I Am Love

The Square – with  Director, Nash Edgerton Q&A

Exit Through The Gift Shop

PFS Spring Preview Wrap Up

Interested in the origins of Tinsel & Tine – Happy Birthday Tinsel & Tine

I don’t consider myself a dyed-in-the wool film buff, I like to write fun, original and informative posts from the perspective of a lover of good storytelling.  However, I welcome comments from film aficionados and casual movie-goers alike!

The Losers: The Filmadelphia Review

April 22nd, 2010

By Craig McCarthy

It’s tough doing a review of a big, shoot-em-up action movie like The Losers.  They shouldn’t be judged in the same way as dramas or comedies because in the end all you want out of them are explosions and fun.  So going into such movies I like to look at three criteria:  Do I like the heroes?  Do I like/dislike the villain?  And most importantly, are the action scenes fun?

Unfortunately, The Losers didn’t do much for me on all three accounts.

The story (based on the comic book series of the same name by Andy Diggle) revolves around five members of an elite US military force who are sent on a mission to Bolivia, where they are double crossed and left for dead by a powerful man known only as Max.  During their quest for revenge, they are helped by the beautiful and mysterious Aisha (played by Zoë Saldaña who seems to be on her way to becoming Hollywood’s new “it” girl) who seems to have her own dubious motives.

Despite being likeable, the heroes just aren’t complete enough to really have me rooting for them.  The leader and main character is Clay (Jeffery Dean Morgan from Watchmen).  He’s strong, gruff, smart, and makes plenty of wisecracking jokes.  There are moments in Losers when you start to really like him, but then he’ll do something the next scene to contradict himself.  He is supposed to be the moral center, the guy who is loyal to his men, the guy who puts the safety of innocent people above all else.  Then, he’ll go and put everything at risk to have sex with Zoë Saldaña.  I felt the best character was Roque (Idris Elba from The Office and The Wire).  He plays the right hand man of Clay and is the only one who seems to be morally torn.  Of course he wants revenge, but he’s the one who seems to truly care about his men safely getting back home and reclaiming their lives.  Elba actually shows great range as an actor and I felt myself siding with him throughout most of the movie.

The problem with the rest of the heroes is that their personalities can be summed up in one phrase.  Jensen (Chris Evans) is… a Chris Evans character.  He does nothing but make jokes every time he speaks and is generally just annoying to everybody.  Personally, I hate Chris Evans (except in Sunshine but I chalk that up more to good directing by Danny Boyle) but people seem to respond to him, so if you usually like Chris Evans, you’ll probably like him here.  Then there is Pooch (Columbus Short) who is the guy with a pregnant wife back home.  And finally there’s Couger (Oscar Jaenada) who is the guy who shoots well with a sniper rifle (the least defined character who actually seems to do most of the killing).  Also, he apparently really likes his cowboy hat.  However, lots of credit is deserved to Zoë Saldaña.  Despite having mediocre dialogue, she plays the role of sexy femme fatale as well as it can be played.

Probably the worst part of the movie is the villain.  Max (Jason Patric from Narc) is an all-powerful leader of organizations like the CIA and NSA.  His convoluted plot is to set off a nuke in Los Angeles, blame it on another country, and start a war.  This will make him lots of money, or give him more power, or something else I didn’t quite understand.  The problem with Max is that he has absolutely no defining characteristics.  He is evil, that’s for sure, but that’s about it.  He’s kind of a well-dressed CEO type who has lots of snappy dialogue that is delivered as stiffly as possible.  It’s obvious that Patric (who is a fine actor) made a choice that just did not work.  Cartoonish villains need to have wild and ridiculous characteristics (both physical and personality-wise), and Max has nothing.

But the most important part of an action movie is the action scenes, and I just didn’t really enjoy them.  My problem with the action scenes is a problem I have with most action films these days:  I have no idea what’s going on during these scenes.  It’s what some people have called the “Cinema of the Incoherent”.  It’s the Bourne Trilogy style of editing where there is a cut every half-second and you never really see what’s happening except for flashes of blood or bodies falling.  Things are moving so fast that I don’t have a chance to get pumped up during these scenes.  I don’t understand why movies sink so much money into these huge explosions and CGI set-pieces when the viewer doesn’t really get to see it.

Despite the negative things I’ve written, most of the people in the theater seemed to love the movie.  The fast-cutting style is becoming popular which means that most people enjoy it.  When it comes down to it, The Losers is stylistically almost exactly like Smoking Aces, and the characters can be very fun.  So if you liked Smoking Aces you definitely will enjoy The Losers.